Naturally I was excited. I had written a blog in October (Mid-day update: Good News for 2 Stocks) when a competitor of PVD was bought by the Principal Group at a very nice premium. So I went to the PVD Yahoo page and read the headlines. It was poorly written, to say the least (MetLife Buys Provida for $2B to Expand in Latin America).
First, even the headline was a head-scratcher. It said Provida was being bought for $2b. but the market cap of PVD starting on Friday was a bit north of $2.4b! How could it be sold for $0.4b less? At first I thought maybe there is another Provida? Then I thought I had the answer when I read the text:
MetLife Inc.
(MET), the largest U.S. life insurer, agreed to buy Chilean pension manager
AFP
Provida SA (PROVIDA) from Banco
Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (BBVA) in a deal valued at about $2 billion to
add fee income in Latin America.
MetLife will conduct a public cash tender offer for all of the outstanding shares of Provida, the insurer said in a statement. BBVA has agreed to transfer its 64.3 percent stake to MetLife, according to the statement.
I thought perhaps the 64.3% was they key. MET was paying $2b to BBVA for the 64.3% of the company. So I got out my trusty calculator and divided $2b by 64.3% to get the total value of the deal and got $3.1b. Some more quick math showed that would equate to a 28% premium to Thursday's closing price, which seemed reasonable.
I was pretty pumped as 28% of what I had in PVD was going to be one of the best days I had every had on a stock. I was already up more than 75% on them from when I bought them in 2011.
So around 9 in the morning, I checked the bid/ask on PVD. They had closed Thursday at $109.90, so I am thinking around $140 a share (woo-hoo!). Imagine my dismay when I saw a ask at $108 and a bid at $103. Now this is a very lightly traded stock in the US, so my first thought was, "they do not understand the deal! They think it is $2b, not $3.1b". $2b would imply a price in low 90s. I was so sure it was screwed up, I actually went in to Fidelity and put in a bid for 200 shares at $104 for pre-market trading (something I rarely do and frankly has never worked out well for me). I was looking at other headlines and found one quoting a banker in Santiago that people were disappointed that the deal was done so cheaply and that PVD had opened up down 6% in Chilean markets. I quickly withdrew my trade.
PVD ended up down about 5% in the US. It was not until the end of the day that I finally understood the price. Stockholders were not only getting the $2b. They would also get dividends from 2012 profits and a dividend for the sale of the Mexican arm and Ecqudorian arm of PVD. The total estimate of these three pieces was $340m. They closed with a market cap of $2.31b, so it is all now making sense. The only real question was why BBVA sold their stake "cheaply". But they are a distressed seller (I am sure they need capital to shore things up in Spain). And it was a cheap price, as PVD paid over $8 just in dividends last year and are growing at a 15% pace. In my mind, clearly worth more than $105 a share.
No reason for me to hold until the transaction closes in a few quarters, so I will sell next week. Here is a snapshot of my entire dividend portfolio. You can see PVD has been a great performer, even at the 5% haircut!
Stock | Shares | Avg Cost | Current Price | Dividends Received | Pct Change | R3K Change | Diff |
150 | 527.94 | 453.62 | - | -14.1% | 6.9% | -21.0% | |
AOD | 10,000 | 3.90 | 4.06 | - | 4.2% | 1.5% | 2.7% |
BHK | 2,259 | 12.78 | 15.47 | 2,861 | 31.0% | 12.5% | 18.5% |
CIM | 15,000 | 2.67 | 3.12 | - | 16.8% | 3.6% | 13.2% |
4,292 | 17.22 | 20.83 | 2,014 | 23.7% | 14.0% | 9.7% | |
CSQ | 5,482 | 8.28 | 10.39 | 5,620 | 37.9% | 29.9% | 8.1% |
1,110 | 32.20 | 35.73 | 344 | 11.9% | 7.5% | 4.5% | |
HFC | 904 | 36.03 | 52.77 | 1,960 | 52.5% | 10.9% | 41.6% |
INTC | 1,974 | 20.99 | 21.36 | 1,998 | 6.5% | 23.3% | -16.7% |
JPM | 1,684 | 35.30 | 47.85 | 1,494 | 38.1% | 13.8% | 24.2% |
JQC | 4,221 | 9.12 | 10.05 | 4,945 | 23.1% | 13.3% | 9.8% |
KMF | 1,873 | 22.08 | 32.04 | 4,454 | 55.9% | 25.8% | 30.0% |
MPC | 382 | 44.01 | 76.21 | 356 | 75.3% | 11.4% | 63.9% |
O | 561 | 19.51 | 43.40 | 7,564 | 191.6% | 77.7% | 113.9% |
3,948 | 4.94 | 6.61 | 6,821 | 68.7% | 78.4% | -9.7% | |
2,118 | 20.56 | 22.68 | 2,596 | 16.3% | 12.0% | 4.3% | |
536 | 67.43 | 88.18 | 1,286 | 34.3% | 12.3% | 22.0% | |
427 | 65.11 | 104.48 | 3,788 | 74.1% | 26.2% | 47.9% | |
SAI | 4,726 | 12.83 | 12.18 | 1,938 | -1.9% | 7.6% | -9.4% |
SLCA | 2,062 | 14.34 | 20.04 | 1,000 | 43.2% | 5.4% | 37.8% |
1,040 | 23.82 | 27.00 | 1,121 | 17.9% | 28.7% | -10.8% | |
VIVHY | 2,296 | 16.70 | 21.61 | 3,749 | 39.2% | 10.8% | 28.4% |
Total Open | 55,909 | 26.5% | 14.7% | 11.9% | |||
Closed | 11.5% | 9.7% | 1.8% | ||||
Combined | 15.7% | 11.1% | 4.6% | ||||
Annualized IRR Since 12/31/10 | 17.2% | ||||||
2013 Gain | 6.0% |
No comments:
Post a Comment