Well, I pulled out my trusty slide ruler today and did a little bit of number crunching. I took a look at my spreadsheet underlying my listing of the top 200 stocks a year ago. I wanted to test how MFI did in the past year and also try to quantify the impact of the Chinese RTOs.So I took all the stocks in my file from a year ago (about 3,200) that were sorted by MFI ranking. I then tried to calculate how much the stock changed year-over-year and then look at the decile results similar to JG's book. Finally, I pulled out every stock that was listed at being in China, to see how that changed things.
Before I show my findings, I will caveat that this is not a simple exercise (especially on a slide ruler). Many stocks may have had special dividends, splits, been sold, gone bankrupt, been spun into two etc over the course of a year. I made an honest effort to correct for these items, but I am but a single man (actually married). If anyone would like to try it themselves, I'd be happy to shoot people a file of stocks just needed the final price filled in.
I do believe that my results are directionally correct. It is likely that errors by decile offset each other. Any certainly the numbers in total (down about 8% year over year), is not far off from what the Wilshire index of total market was.
Here are the deciles (a bit more that 300 stocks per decile):
| Decile 1 | -8.96% |
| Decile 2 | -2.95% |
| Decile 3 | -5.14% |
| Decile 4 | -6.09% |
| Decile 5 | -12.55% |
| Decile 6 | -9.95% |
| Decile 7 | -6.87% |
| Decile 8 | -6.86% |
| Decile 9 | -12.67% |
| Decile 10 | -10.20% |
So Decile 1, which would have the MFI stocks was actually worse than the overall average (-8.7%). Otherwise, we do see the progression Greenblatt showed in his studies with 2, 3 and 4 being the best three. Now, let us pull out Chinese stocks.
| Decile 1 | -1.91% |
| Decile 2 | 1.44% |
| Decile 3 | -3.10% |
| Decile 4 | -5.01% |
| Decile 5 | -10.49% |
| Decile 6 | -7.51% |
| Decile 7 | -5.04% |
| Decile 8 | -5.44% |
| Decile 9 | -11.27% |
| Decile 10 | -9.06% |
Wow! Pretty interesting stuff. That pretty much normalized the list (-5.55% overall). Let us try one more cut, pretty much remove all emerging markets. So only countries are the following:
| Row Labels | Count of Country |
| Canada | 135 |
| France | 9 |
| Germany | 5 |
| Italy | 5 |
| Japan | 15 |
| Luxembourg | 4 |
| Netherlands | 17 |
| Norway | 1 |
| Portugal | 1 |
| Spain | 3 |
| Sweden | 2 |
| Switzerland | 13 |
| United Kingdom | 21 |
| USA | 2,588 |
| Grand Total | 2,819 |
| Column1 | Column2 |
| Decile 1 | -0.12% |
| Decile 2 | 2.92% |
| Decile 3 | -1.83% |
| Decile 4 | -3.62% |
| Decile 5 | -9.35% |
| Decile 6 | -4.92% |
| Decile 7 | -3.33% |
| Decile 8 | -3.58% |
| Decile 9 | -12.56% |
| Decile 10 | -8.49% |
What do I make of all this? The Magic Formula may be working better than we're giving credit. On my top 200 lists going forward, I will include country as that seems to be a crucial element. As always I am interested in people's comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment