Another month/year has flown by. And so it is time to look at another monthly tracking portfolio as we hit the end of March 2018. As my faithful readers know, I have been tracking the Magic Formula Stocks as described by Joel Greenblatt in The Little Book That Beats the Stock Market since January 2006. Every month I take the top 50 stocks over $100m market cap from his website and track how that portfolio of stocks fares versus the Russell 3000 for the next 12 months. It has been an uphill struggle as the tracking portfolios have under-performed, driven in part by Chinese reverse merger fiascos, for-profit education stocks and home health care stocks all being proverbial albatrosses.
I also encourage new readers to read
Guide To New Readers
(you can also find this in Archives of October 2017)
But even with that being said, Value stocks have not exactly been in favor the past couple of years, although this appears to be changing (although painstakingly slowly).
Onward
Fearless readers will recall we had a 29 month "losing streak".. Then we had a 13 month winning streak. Now we have a 6 month losing streak, getting whooped 18.7% to 9.2%. U G L Y.
The past three month/years (February, January and December) have been the worst 3 month relative losers to the benchmark of my 130+ month/years. Not time for woo-hoo!
Guess what? We are still struggling. The 50 stocks on the screen got beaten by 7.2 percentage points (13.6% to 6.4%). At least that is better than 9.8 point shellacking posted last month. It has been rugged. Greenblatt warned there would be times people would want to quit and this would ensure in working down the road.
And 5 of the 11 open portfolios are trailing, by about 1.2 points on average, So you can see why I am excited that both my real money MFI portfolios are beating benchmark. That is actually an accomplishment in today's market that loves growth and disruptors.
Here are the 50 stocks in descending performance order (from the portfolio that just hit a year):
Stock | Initial Price | End Price | Percent Change | Mkt Cap |
RCM | 3.09 | 7.14 | 131.1% | 330 |
VEC | 22.35 | 37.24 | 66.6% | 240 |
SCMP | 11.00 | 18.00 | 63.6% | 477 |
KORS | 38.11 | 62.08 | 62.9% | 6,346 |
MCFT | 16.17 | 25.20 | 55.8% | 301 |
BBSI | 53.74 | 82.88 | 54.2% | 396 |
MNKD | 1.48 | 2.28 | 54.1% | 142 |
SYNT | 16.83 | 25.53 | 51.7% | 1,408 |
USNA | 57.60 | 85.90 | 49.1% | 1,410 |
MBUU | 22.45 | 33.21 | 47.9% | 400 |
BPT | 17.06 | 23.90 | 40.1% | 430 |
TVTY | 29.10 | 39.65 | 36.3% | 1,133 |
CSCO | 32.67 | 42.89 | 31.3% | 169,237 |
PDLI | 2.27 | 2.94 | 29.5% | 376 |
TDC | 31.12 | 39.67 | 27.5% | 4,064 |
BKE | 17.59 | 22.15 | 25.9% | 904 |
HPQ | 17.41 | 21.92 | 25.9% | 30,278 |
CSGS | 37.11 | 45.29 | 22.1% | 1,220 |
TRNC | 13.92 | 16.42 | 18.0% | 507 |
GILD | 66.04 | 75.39 | 14.2% | 88,839 |
CA | 30.75 | 33.90 | 10.2% | 13,109 |
ESRX | 65.91 | 69.08 | 4.8% | 40,759 |
DLX | 70.92 | 74.01 | 4.4% | 3,504 |
GHC | 594.29 | 602.25 | 1.3% | 3,365 |
NSR | 33.15 | 33.50 | 1.1% | 1,820 |
BIIB | 273.42 | 273.82 | 0.1% | 59,059 |
RGR | 52.43 | 52.50 | 0.1% | 1,001 |
PCO | 639.16 | 634.50 | -0.7% | 174 |
AVID | 4.66 | 4.54 | -2.6% | 189 |
MSGN | 23.35 | 22.60 | -3.2% | 1,753 |
AMAG | 22.55 | 20.15 | -10.6% | 774 |
PBI | 12.33 | 10.89 | -11.6% | 2,434 |
AMCX | 58.68 | 51.70 | -11.9% | 4,023 |
MIK | 22.39 | 19.71 | -12.0% | 4,328 |
OMC | 83.63 | 72.67 | -13.1% | 20,233 |
IDCC | 84.90 | 73.60 | -13.3% | 2,960 |
UTHR | 135.38 | 112.36 | -17.0% | 6,164 |
TGNA | 25.62 | 20.83 | -18.7% | 5,495 |
UIS | 13.95 | 10.75 | -22.9% | 699 |
TZOO | 9.65 | 7.28 | -24.6% | 133 |
NLS | 18.25 | 13.45 | -26.3% | 563 |
MPAA | 30.73 | 21.43 | -30.3% | 608 |
NHTC | 28.23 | 19.01 | -32.7% | 326 |
AGX | 65.17 | 42.95 | -34.1% | 1,011 |
GME | 20.81 | 12.62 | -39.3% | 2,265 |
AGTC | 6.90 | 3.85 | -44.2% | 125 |
SQBG | 3.89 | 2.09 | -46.3% | 243 |
AOBC | 19.81 | 10.32 | -47.9% | 1,116 |
DHX | 3.95 | 1.60 | -59.5% | 196 |
ICON | 7.52 | 1.11 | -85.2% | 429 |
This table is SO MFI. Look at the spread of results. Nine of the 50 names are -30% or worse. And four are +60% or better. Just for illustration, I will pick 5 random portfolios of 5 stocks to show the variability using a random number generator. Keep in mind that the average of the 50 names is 6.4%.
Random # | Stock | Gain/Loss |
5 | AGX | -34.1% |
49 | USNA | 49.1% |
4 | AGTC | -44.2% |
38 | SQBG | -46.3% |
46 | TRNC | 18.0% |
Average | -11.5% |
Random # | Stock | Gain/Loss |
43 | TDC | 27.5% |
22 | IDCC | -13.3% |
45 | TZOO | -24.6% |
15 | DHX | -59.5% |
24 | MNKD | 54.1% |
Average | -3.2% |
Random # | Stock | Gain/Loss |
47 | UIS | -22.9% |
31 | NLS | -26.3% |
48 | UTHR | -17.0% |
46 | TRNC | 18.0% |
40 | SCMP | 63.6% |
Average | 3.1% |
Random # | Stock | Gain/Loss |
3 | AOBC | -47.9% |
14 | DLX | 4.4% |
25 | MCFT | 55.8% |
17 | GME | -39.3% |
46 | TRNC | 18.0% |
Average | -1.8% |
Random # | Stock | Gain/Loss |
20 | HPQ | 25.9% |
50 | VEC | 66.6% |
27 | MIK | -12.0% |
15 | DHX | -59.5% |
24 | MNKD | 54.1% |
Average | 15.0% |
I promise I did not "fix" anything. Totally random here. But you can see individual portfolios of 5 stocks vary greatly around the overall average of 6.4%.
Here is a listing of every portfolio I have tracked:
Date | MFI | R3K | Lead |
1/6/2006 | 16.0% | 10.9% | 1 |
2/17/2006 | 21.2% | 14.6% | 1 |
3/29/2006 | 13.0% | 9.6% | 1 |
4/7/2006 | 10.3% | 12.1% | 0 |
5/12/2006 | 20.4% | 18.6% | 1 |
5/31/2006 | 29.2% | 23.3% | 1 |
6/30/2006 | 22.4% | 20.0% | 1 |
7/31/2006 | 19.7% | 17.3% | 1 |
8/31/2006 | 13.0% | 13.3% | 0 |
9/28/2006 | 12.7% | 14.6% | 0 |
10/27/2006 | 10.3% | 12.0% | 0 |
11/29/2006 | -0.3% | 4.8% | 0 |
12/28/2006 | -6.9% | 3.4% | 0 |
1/26/2007 | -10.2% | -6.6% | 0 |
2/27/2007 | -3.7% | -1.0% | 0 |
3/26/2007 | -9.8% | -5.5% | 0 |
4/27/2007 | -10.9% | -5.0% | 0 |
5/29/2007 | -11.5% | -6.3% | 0 |
7/3/2007 | -30.0% | -15.6% | 0 |
7/30/2007 | -19.9% | -11.5% | 0 |
8/30/2007 | -12.5% | -8.7% | 0 |
9/27/2007 | -19.0% | -18.2% | 0 |
11/2/2007 | -40.4% | -34.3% | 0 |
11/28/2007 | -40.1% | -38.3% | 0 |
12/28/2007 | -36.3% | -40.0% | 1 |
1/25/2008 | -36.4% | -35.9% | 0 |
2/26/2008 | -51.7% | -41.5% | 0 |
3/24/2008 | -40.9% | -36.8% | 0 |
4/25/2008 | -25.6% | -31.0% | 1 |
5/28/2008 | -22.2% | -33.6% | 1 |
7/2/2008 | -11.7% | -25.3% | 1 |
7/29/2008 | -10.5% | -20.9% | 1 |
8/29/2008 | -13.8% | -17.9% | 1 |
9/26/2008 | -4.3% | -10.0% | 1 |
10/31/2008 | 18.7% | 13.9% | 1 |
11/26/2008 | 50.9% | 27.7% | 1 |
12/26/2008 | 48.9% | 32.3% | 1 |
1/23/2009 | 59.3% | 36.4% | 1 |
2/27/2009 | 92.8% | 55.6% | 1 |
3/27/2009 | 85.8% | 48.1% | 1 |
4/24/2009 | 69.7% | 45.8% | 1 |
5/29/2009 | 31.8% | 22.8% | 1 |
6/29/2009 | 21.3% | 24.0% | 0 |
7/29/2009 | 19.5% | 15.9% | 1 |
8/28/2009 | 7.4% | 8.8% | 0 |
9/25/2009 | 12.6% | 12.4% | 1 |
10/30/2009 | 22.7% | 18.3% | 1 |
11/27/2009 | 24.3% | 13.6% | 1 |
12/31/2009 | 23.7% | 18.1% | 1 |
1/22/2010 | 19.0% | 20.6% | 0 |
2/26/2010 | 18.6% | 23.6% | 0 |
3/25/2010 | 10.0% | 15.4% | 0 |
4/23/2010 | 7.1% | 11.4% | 0 |
5/28/2010 | 19.3% | 25.4% | 0 |
6/29/2010 | 16.7% | 25.7% | 0 |
7/29/2010 | 5.4% | 20.1% | 0 |
9/2/2010 | 7.3% | 10.1% | 0 |
9/24/2010 | -4.3% | 0.3% | 0 |
10/29/2010 | -2.9% | 10.4% | 0 |
11/26/2010 | -8.5% | 1.4% | 0 |
1/3/2011 | -11.4% | 0.1% | 0 |
1/28/2011 | -7.6% | 4.9% | 0 |
2/25/2011 | -5.5% | 5.0% | 0 |
3/24/2011 | -4.4% | 7.4% | 0 |
4/21/2011 | -16.0% | 3.2% | 0 |
5/27/2011 | -12.0% | -0.4% | 0 |
6/24/2011 | -9.5% | 5.0% | 0 |
7/29/2011 | -4.3% | 8.1% | 0 |
8/26/2011 | 12.0% | 21.6% | 0 |
9/30/2011 | 23.5% | 29.6% | 0 |
10/28/2011 | 0.4% | 11.5% | 0 |
11/25/2011 | 13.9% | 24.0% | 0 |
12/29/2011 | 9.9% | 15.9% | 0 |
1/27/2012 | 7.4% | 16.6% | 0 |
2/24/2012 | 7.8% | 13.3% | 0 |
3/23/2012 | 9.1% | 15.2% | 0 |
4/27/2012 | 10.5% | 15.3% | 0 |
5/25/2012 | 23.4% | 27.5% | 0 |
6/22/2012 | 26.1% | 24.6% | 1 |
7/27/2012 | 30.4% | 25.7% | 1 |
8/24/2012 | 26.0% | 19.8% | 1 |
9/28/2012 | 39.3% | 22.1% | 1 |
10/26/2012 | 48.3% | 28.9% | 1 |
11/23/2012 | 45.7% | 32.1% | 1 |
12/31/2012 | 52.3% | 33.0% | 1 |
1/25/2013 | 39.5% | 22.0% | 1 |
2/22/2013 | 46.5% | 26.4% | 1 |
3/28/2013 | 40.1% | 21.2% | 1 |
4/26/2013 | 35.0% | 20.5% | 1 |
5/24/2013 | 20.4% | 19.2% | 1 |
6/28/2013 | 26.9% | 24.1% | 1 |
7/29/2013 | 17.8% | 19.0% | 0 |
8/30/2013 | 17.5% | 24.6% | 0 |
9/27/2013 | 12.9% | 17.7% | 0 |
10/25/2013 | 11.8% | 15.4% | 0 |
11/29/2013 | 12.3% | 15.6% | 0 |
12/31/2013 | 12.7% | 11.9% | 1 |
1/31/2014 | 14.2% | 13.0% | 1 |
2/28/2014 | 15.4% | 13.9% | 1 |
3/28/2014 | 6.1% | 12.3% | 0 |
4/25/2014 | 8.6% | 15.8% | 0 |
5/30/2014 | 5.9% | 11.7% | 0 |
6/27/2014 | 2.5% | 9.2% | 0 |
7/25/2014 | 3.3% | 8.7% | 0 |
8/29/2014 | -2.2% | 1.0% | 0 |
9/26/2014 | -0.6% | -0.9% | 1 |
10/31/2014 | 4.3% | 4.4% | 0 |
11/28/2014 | -2.9% | 2.9% | 0 |
12/31/2014 | -9.3% | 0.3% | 0 |
1/30/2015 | -12.4% | -2.8% | 0 |
2/27/2015 | -19.0% | -7.3% | 0 |
3/27/2015 | -17.1% | -1.9% | 0 |
4/24/2015 | -15.4% | -0.8% | 0 |
5/29/2015 | -14.1% | 0.1% | 0 |
6/26/2015 | -8.7% | 0.4% | 0 |
7/30/2015 | 3.96% | 4.02% | 0 |
8/28/2015 | 5.6% | 10.2% | 0 |
9/25/2015 | 6.5% | 13.8% | 0 |
10/30/2015 | 2.0% | 4.0% | 0 |
11/27/2015 | 8.9% | 8.4% | 1 |
12/31/2015 | 13.7% | 12.6% | 1 |
1/29/2016 | 22.6% | 22.4% | 1 |
2/26/2016 | 27.8% | 25.4% | 1 |
3/24/2016 | 26.5% | 19.6% | 1 |
4/22/2016 | 13.7% | 14.8% | 0 |
5/27/2016 | 14.3% | 15.6% | 0 |
6/30/2016 | 23.2% | 16.1% | 1 |
7/29/2016 | 17.1% | 16.0% | 1 |
8/26/2016 | 10.6% | 14.6% | 0 |
9/30/2016 | 18.6% | 18.5% | 1 |
10/28/2016 | 18.3% | 24.1% | 0 |
11/25/2016 | 7.4% | 19.2% | 0 |
12/30/2016 | 4.7% | 20.5% | 0 |
1/27/2017 | 10.5% | 17.2% | 0 |
2/24/2017 | 7.6% | 17.4% | 0 |
3/31/2017 | 6.4% | 13.6% | 0 |
4/28/2017 | 1.9% | 12.5% | 0 |
5/26/2017 | 4.8% | 11.1% | 0 |
6/29/2017 | 2.3% | 10.5% | 0 |
7/28/2017 | 2.6% | 8.3% | 0 |
8/25/2017 | 12.2% | 9.6% | 1 |
9/29/2017 | 2.8% | 5.6% | 0 |
10/27/2017 | 5.7% | 3.1% | 1 |
11/24/2017 | 4.2% | 2.0% | 1 |
12/29/2017 | 6.9% | -0.8% | 1 |
1/26/2018 | -3.3% | -7.2% | 1 |
2/23/2018 | -2.2% | -3.3% | 1 |
You can see 4/28/17 is also looking terrible with a month to run.
Dividend Subset
My backtracking has shown that MFI stocks that pay a dividend seem to do better. I believe this is because a dividends infers that income flows are more likely to be sustainable. This tends to extract stocks with large one time payments. That was true again this month-year. My dividend MFI portfolio (which are stocks I track with a yield of 2.6% or greater) were up 16.6%. MUCH better than the 7.6% for all fifty MFI stocks I tracked.
Finally, I like to track cash as it is more "honest" than percentages as if you go up by 25% and then down by 25%, that is a different result than up by 5% then down by 5%. So I track what you would have today if you had spread $100,000 over the first twelve portfolios evenly. I think it is obvious why my formula approach is a function of dividend subset.
Category | Value |
Total | 214,412 |
Total Russell 3K | 257,749 |
Dividend | 491,230 |
3 comments:
Hey Marsh,
So the backtest Dividend portfolio is just a subset of the MFI index which is 50 mfi stocks selected once a year. It is all of those stocks with a 2.6% or greater yield?
I've been playing around with using dividend longevity/growth (like the etf VIG) and/or buybacks as the "quality" prong with the usual EV/EBIT earnings yield as the cheap prong. As I've mentioned before I think the high yield is like a double value screen but I do think there is something tilting to cheap companies actually generating cash for shareholders.
I'll let you know if I do a post about it.
Yes, the dividend subset is just the stocks in the MFI index with dividend yield of 2.6% or greater. I do include stocks with special dividends within past 12 months, like MCFT. Interested to hear about your findings.
Post a Comment