I am starting to consider a change of approach for my MFI Select. MFI Select has been running since August 2012. While it has been successful, it has also been volatile (especially of late). As a reminder, here is my month to month moves, assuming I started with 100,000:
Date | Differential | MFI Value | R3K Value |
12/1/2012 | -2.20% | 99,765 | 101,965 |
1/1/2013 | -1.78% | 102,798 | 104,575 |
2/1/2013 | -2.26% | 102,594 | 104,856 |
3/1/2013 | -2.23% | 102,881 | 105,114 |
4/1/2013 | -0.43% | 106,804 | 107,234 |
5/1/2013 | 2.00% | 110,423 | 108,423 |
6/1/2013 | 4.75% | 115,831 | 111,085 |
7/1/2013 | 4.29% | 114,888 | 110,597 |
8/1/2013 | 6.91% | 124,799 | 117,889 |
9/1/2013 | 10.46% | 124,536 | 114,079 |
10/1/2013 | 19.67% | 138,655 | 118,990 |
11/1/2013 | 19.75% | 143,514 | 123,764 |
12/1/2013 | 23.70% | 150,105 | 126,405 |
1/1/2014 | 26.63% | 157,138 | 130,503 |
2/1/2014 | 24.70% | 150,619 | 125,918 |
3/1/2014 | 25.66% | 158,116 | 132,458 |
4/1/2014 | 30.38% | 162,991 | 132,616 |
5/1/2014 | 29.65% | 162,428 | 132,779 |
6/1/2014 | 31.44% | 167,001 | 135,559 |
7/1/2014 | 39.23% | 177,971 | 138,740 |
8/1/2014 | 31.13% | 167,054 | 135,922 |
9/1/2014 | 35.90% | 177,792 | 141,892 |
10/1/2014 | 29.38% | 168,321 | 138,944 |
11/1/2014 | 26.14% | 168,810 | 142,666 |
12/1/2014 | 30.22% | 176,420 | 146,198 |
1/1/2015 | 28.17% | 174,306 | 146,140 |
2/1/2015 | 20.63% | 162,833 | 142,201 |
3/1/2015 | 25.15% | 175,476 | 150,324 |
4/1/2015 | 29.95% | 178,565 | 148,612 |
5/1/2015 | 37.31% | 186,655 | 149,348 |
6/1/2015 | 51.53% | 202,897 | 151,371 |
7/1/2015 | 62.69% | 211,437 | 148,743 |
8/1/2015 | 40.75% | 192,117 | 151,369 |
9/1/2015 | 36.41% | 178,603 | 142,195 |
10/1/2015 | 43.12% | 181,175 | 138,052 |
11/1/2015 | 69.02% | 217,959 | 148,936 |
12/1/2015 | 73.49% | 223,435 | 149,946 |
1/1/2016 | 63.33% | 209,514 | 146,186 |
2/1/2016 | 49.49% | 187,428 | 137,934 |
3/1/2016 | 56.48% | 194,415 | 137,934 |
4/1/2016 | 47.34% | 195,770 | 148,430 |
5/1/2016 | 46.38% | 194,301 | 147,923 |
6/1/2016 | 51.44% | 201,999 | 150,558 |
7/1/2016 | 50.41% | 201,092 | 150,680 |
8/1/2016 | 52.72% | 207,223 | 154,501 |
9/1/2016 | 67.04% | 222,481 | 155,446 |
10/1/2016 | 42.98% | 198,563 | 155,582 |
11/1/2016 | 41.86% | 195,726 | 153,863 |
12/1/2016 | 45.92% | 202,775 | 156,859 |
1/1/2017 | 45.60% | 209,503 | 163,936 |
2/1/2017 | 45.20% | 212,330 | 167,146 |
3/1/2017 | 48.80% | 222,583 | 173,829 |
4/1/2017 | 55.70% | 229,473 | 173,735 |
5/1/2017 | 55.80% | 231,497 | 175,712 |
6/1/2017 | 53.40% | 230,599 | 177,203 |
7/1/2017 | 60.28% | 239,060 | 178,782 |
8/1/2017 | 57.76% | 239,924 | 182,163 |
9/1/2017 | 68.85% | 251,265 | 182,419 |
10/1/2017 | 75.60% | 262,489 | 186,886 |
11/1/2017 | 68.17% | 259,061 | 190,888 |
12/1/2017 | 84.17% | 280,887 | 196,716 |
1/1/2018 | 92.19% | 291,114 | 198,926 |
2/1/2018 | 98.28% | 307,410 | 209,126 |
3/1/2018 | 97.96% | 299,427 | 201,471 |
4/1/2018 | 96.21% | 293,665 | 197,451 |
5/1/2018 | 75.02% | 273,091 | 198,076 |
6/1/2018 | 61.79% | 265,392 | 203,603 |
7/1/2018 | 68.20% | 273,125 | 204,921 |
8/1/2018 | 62.87% | 274,585 | 211,717 |
9/1/2018 | 63.61% | 282,508 | 218,902 |
10/1/2018 | 65.80% | 284,097 | 218,297 |
11/1/2018 | 61.26% | 264,512 | 203,248 |
12/1/2018 | 57.71% | 265,009 | 207,297 |
1/1/2019 | 39.77% | 228,246 | 188,479 |
Current | 51.56% | 252,734 | 201,174 |
So you can see I sent from 307,410 on 2/1/18 to a low of 228,246 as of January 1st this year. That is a 26% drop. Now I have recovered a chunk of that so far this month. But it made me think, as a retired person, should I be more spread out to perhaps avoid this type of drop? At this point of my life, I am not really trying to get rich, but rather ensure that I have enough money for the rest of my (and my wife's) life.
Alternative Approach
Steven D, in the comment section, has espoused that stocks greater than $3b and with a dividend yield > 2.5% (but less than 5%) have done very well over past 4+ years. While I believe his time period is too short to draw complete conclusions, I am thinking about >$3b and a dividend yield >2% as my filter.
So MFI Formula will be $600m and greater, but Select will be larger than $3b. But the other twist, to reduce volatility (hopefully) is I will buy 10 stocks in each tranche. So here is the way it would currently look:
Top 50 over 3b:
Ticker | Market Cap | Price | Dividend | Yield |
AYI | 4,735 | 118.79 | 0.52 | 0.44% |
ALSN | 6,273 | 48.39 | 0.60 | 1.24% |
MO | 83,174 | 44.24 | 3.00 | 6.78% |
AMCX | 3,660 | 64.76 | - | 0.00% |
ABC | 16,985 | 79.66 | 1.54 | 1.93% |
AMGN | 127,312 | 198.77 | 5.29 | 2.66% |
AAPL | 750,147 | 157.76 | 2.82 | 1.79% |
AMAT | 37,897 | 39.19 | 0.80 | 2.04% |
BBY | 16,140 | 59.34 | 1.80 | 3.03% |
BIIB | 67,853 | 336.70 | - | 0.00% |
HRB | 5,325 | 25.91 | 0.99 | 3.82% |
CPRI | 6,501 | 42.41 | - | 0.00% |
CBS | 18,449 | 49.17 | 0.72 | 1.46% |
CDK | 6,660 | 51.39 | 0.60 | 1.17% |
CELG | 61,238 | 87.62 | - | 0.00% |
COHR | 3,037 | 124.99 | - | 0.00% |
CVS | 66,694 | 65.45 | 2.00 | 3.06% |
DNB | 5,368 | 144.69 | 1.56 | 1.08% |
DXC | 17,816 | 63.34 | 0.75 | 1.18% |
EME | 3,720 | 64.41 | 0.32 | 0.50% |
FFIV | 9,519 | 158.50 | - | 0.00% |
GILD | 89,294 | 68.90 | 2.28 | 3.31% |
EAF | 3,722 | 12.81 | 0.23 | 1.83% |
HPQ | 34,482 | 22.10 | 0.58 | 2.62% |
IPG | 8,613 | 22.41 | 0.84 | 3.75% |
JEC | 9,069 | 63.77 | 0.60 | 0.94% |
JAZZ | 7,676 | 126.93 | - | 0.00% |
KLAC | 15,520 | 101.39 | 2.84 | 2.80% |
LRCX | 26,553 | 165.49 | 3.81 | 2.30% |
LEA | 9,995 | 158.79 | 2.79 | 1.76% |
LPX | 3,407 | 24.01 | 0.52 | 2.17% |
MAN | 4,732 | 74.74 | 2.02 | 2.70% |
MAS | 9,584 | 31.62 | 0.45 | 1.42% |
MCK | 24,823 | 127.05 | 1.46 | 1.15% |
MD | 3,293 | 36.86 | - | 0.00% |
MU | 45,778 | 38.96 | - | 0.00% |
MKSI | 4,290 | 79.46 | 0.78 | 0.98% |
NKTR | 7,601 | 43.92 | - | 0.00% |
OMC | 17,175 | 76.40 | 2.40 | 3.14% |
PM | 113,060 | 72.73 | 4.49 | 6.17% |
RTN | 47,698 | 167.61 | 3.47 | 2.07% |
RHI | 7,403 | 60.99 | 1.12 | 1.84% |
STX | 12,492 | 43.66 | 2.52 | 5.77% |
SWKS | 12,856 | 72.47 | 1.40 | 1.93% |
TER | 6,577 | 36.75 | 0.36 | 0.98% |
TNET | 3,193 | 45.29 | - | 0.00% |
UTHR | 5,453 | 115.93 | - | 0.00% |
VIAB | 11,686 | 28.99 | 0.80 | 2.76% |
WDC | 12,516 | 43.16 | 2.00 | 4.63% |
XRX | 6,016 | 24.54 | 1.00 | 4.07% |
Then filter out those less than 2%:
Number | Ticker | Market Cap | Price | Dividend | Yield |
1 | MO | 83,174 | 44.24 | 3.00 | 6.78% |
2 | AMGN | 127,312 | 198.77 | 5.29 | 2.66% |
3 | AMAT | 37,897 | 39.19 | 0.80 | 2.04% |
4 | BBY | 16,140 | 59.34 | 1.80 | 3.03% |
5 | HRB | 5,325 | 25.91 | 0.99 | 3.82% |
6 | CVS | 66,694 | 65.45 | 2.00 | 3.06% |
7 | GILD | 89,294 | 68.90 | 2.28 | 3.31% |
8 | HPQ | 34,482 | 22.10 | 0.58 | 2.62% |
9 | IPG | 8,613 | 22.41 | 0.84 | 3.75% |
10 | KLAC | 15,520 | 101.39 | 2.84 | 2.80% |
11 | LRCX | 26,553 | 165.49 | 3.81 | 2.30% |
12 | LPX | 3,407 | 24.01 | 0.52 | 2.17% |
13 | MAN | 4,732 | 74.74 | 2.02 | 2.70% |
14 | OMC | 17,175 | 76.40 | 2.40 | 3.14% |
15 | PM | 113,060 | 72.73 | 4.49 | 6.17% |
16 | RTN | 47,698 | 167.61 | 3.47 | 2.07% |
17 | STX | 12,492 | 43.66 | 2.52 | 5.77% |
18 | VIAB | 11,686 | 28.99 | 0.80 | 2.76% |
19 | WDC | 12,516 | 43.16 | 2.00 | 4.63% |
20 | XRX | 6,016 | 24.54 | 1.00 | 4.07% |
Then apply random number generator
Random # | Stock |
8 | HPQ |
19 | WDC |
3 | AMAT |
18 | VIAB |
4 | BBY |
2 | AMGN |
15 | PM |
10 | KLAC |
16 | RTN |
7 | GILD |
I will noodle on this a bit more. I kind of like it. And these stocks will be easier to buy.
3 comments:
I've found a lot of things on your website very interesting. In regards to this issue several things to consider:
1. be prepared using a dividend approach for the possibility of an environment like the late 90s where divs were despised. Doesn't mean it's not a valid approach but simply that it won't always hold an edge during every market cycle and at times will drastically underperform.
2.I think if you ran a return attribution analysis you'd find that it's the real losers that are causing you volatility NOT concentration. I run a portfolio with 10-15 stocks total and peak to trough drawdown last year was 9% (i'm not always 100% invested due to disciplines of cutting losers). My suggestion would be to take a hard look at what it would do to performance if you cut every single loser beyond a certain threshold. That level would all depend upon intial sizing. For myself I never want to see greater than -30% because at an initial 5% weighting this would push me near a -2% portfolio impact. I never want to risk more than 2% per trade.
Thanks for your thoughts. I have actually run an analysis on large amounts of MFI data where I put in rules like "sell early when stocks is down x%" and varied the x to various levels. I found that did not improve results.
I have also wondered about dividend stocks, whether it is because we were in a low interest rate environment or that (for a stretch) the tax treatment of dividends was more favorable. And it is hard to disprove. But my hypothesis is that dividend paying stocks tend to have a more predictable cash flow than non dividend stocks in MFI. And since the biggest assumption in MFI is that the income from the past 12 months is a good proxy for the future, you probably are better with companies with more predictable cash flow.
In some ways that isn't that surprising about the sell discipline given that at times one would sell only to have the stock turn out to be a real winner. For myself I'm a deep value trend investor. It comes with drawbacks like any strategy but its one I can stick with.
And in regards to the dividend approach I think its a solid one - it likely tends to screen out troubled companies (although not perfectly of course). My only point was that at times what is best might not be in favor. Then again hopefully we won't lose our heads quite like we did in the late 90s again.
Thanks for your work.
Post a Comment